![virginia bill of particulars civil virginia bill of particulars civil](https://d20ohkaloyme4g.cloudfront.net/img/document_thumbnails/2b0b0095b4e61dd03ced60a1984ab544/thumb_1200_1553.png)
![virginia bill of particulars civil virginia bill of particulars civil](https://ponderingprinciples.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/VA-Declaration-of-Rights.jpg)
When defense counsel is faced with such a situation, the smart move is to move for a bill of particulars. In some situations, plaintiffs’ lawyers will craft the complaint in such a way as to make an out-of-context statement appear defamatory, when the surrounding statements omitted from the allegations would demonstrate that the statement as a whole could only be reasonably interpreted as hyperbole or opinion. In state court, however, guidance from the Virginia Supreme Court suggests that libel and slander cases should be dismissed on demurrer if defamatory meaning is not readily apparent. In federal court, some judges have denied motions to dismiss such claims on the theory that the merits of the claim-while not apparent from the face of the complaint-are plausible and might be proven at trial. What is a trial court supposed to do if the complaint contains only a short, out-of-context excerpt of the defendant’s statement?
![virginia bill of particulars civil virginia bill of particulars civil](https://attorneydocs.com/wp-content/uploadspreviews/e288099914c34d9ec5c529b948373f9a-791x1024.jpeg)
Before a defamation claim can be presented to a jury, the judge needs to make a preliminary determination that the statement at issue conveys factual information (rather than mere opinions) and that such factual information could be reasonably interpreted as having a defamatory meaning. To bring a successful defamation claim in Virginia state courts, it is necessary to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate to the judge that the statement claimed to be defamatory is capable of conveying a defamatory meaning to a reasonable audience.